0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_vampire %s %d THM 0.07/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu 0.07/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.07/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.07/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.07/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.07/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.07/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.07/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:27:58 UTC 2026 0.07/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.37 This is a THF_ problem 0.12/0.37 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.12/0.39 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-hol --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --print_def_sorts on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.40bOwsrp7Z/E---3.1_3165088.p -m 16384 -t 180 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_3165088 for (1799ds/18Mi) 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)First to succeed. 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.12/0.41 % SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_3165088 0.12/0.41 % SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_3165088 0.12/0.41 thf(type_def_5, type, rat: $tType). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_0, type, rat: $tType). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_1, type, x0: rat). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_2, type, y0: rat). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_3, type, less: rat > rat > $o). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_4, type, is: rat > rat > $o). 0.12/0.41 thf(func_def_5, type, more: rat > rat > $o). 0.12/0.41 thf(f33,plain,( 0.12/0.41 $false), 0.12/0.41 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f32,f26])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f26,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((is @ x0 @ y0) != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f19,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((less @ x0 @ y0) != $true) & ((is @ x0 @ y0) != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f15,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ~(((less @ x0 @ y0) != $true) => ((is @ x0 @ y0) = $true))), 0.12/0.41 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f8,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ~(~((less @ x0 @ y0) = $true) => ((is @ x0 @ y0) = $true))), 0.12/0.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f7,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ~(~(less @ x0 @ y0) => (is @ x0 @ y0))), 0.12/0.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f1,axiom,( 0.12/0.41 ~(~(less @ x0 @ y0) => (is @ x0 @ y0))), 0.12/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.40bOwsrp7Z/E---3.1_3165088.p',n)). 0.12/0.41 thf(f32,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((is @ x0 @ y0) = $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f31,f27])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f27,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((less @ x0 @ y0) != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f31,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((less @ x0 @ y0) = $true) | ((is @ x0 @ y0) = $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f30])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f30,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((less @ x0 @ y0) = $true) | ((is @ x0 @ y0) = $true) | ($true != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f24,f25])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f25,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ( ! [X0 : rat,X1 : rat] : (($true = (more @ X1 @ X0)) | ((less @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true = (is @ X1 @ X0))) )), 0.12/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f23,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X0 : rat,X1 : rat] : (($true = (more @ X1 @ X0)) | ((less @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ($true = (is @ X1 @ X0)))), 0.12/0.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f22])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f22,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X1 : rat,X0 : rat] : (((more @ X0 @ X1) = $true) | ((less @ X0 @ X1) = $true) | ((is @ X0 @ X1) = $true))), 0.12/0.41 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f21])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f21,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X1 : rat,X0 : rat] : ((((less @ X0 @ X1) = $true) | ((more @ X0 @ X1) = $true)) | ((is @ X0 @ X1) = $true))), 0.12/0.41 inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f18,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X1 : rat,X0 : rat] : (((is @ X0 @ X1) != $true) => (((more @ X0 @ X1) != $true) => ((less @ X0 @ X1) = $true)))), 0.12/0.41 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f14])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f14,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X0 : rat,X1 : rat] : (~((is @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => (~((more @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((less @ X0 @ X1) = $true)))), 0.12/0.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f13,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X0 : rat,X1 : rat] : (~(is @ X0 @ X1) => (~(more @ X0 @ X1) => (less @ X0 @ X1)))), 0.12/0.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f2,axiom,( 0.12/0.41 ! [X0 : rat,X1 : rat] : (~(is @ X0 @ X1) => (~(more @ X0 @ X1) => (less @ X0 @ X1)))), 0.12/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.40bOwsrp7Z/E---3.1_3165088.p',satz81a)). 0.12/0.41 thf(f24,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((more @ x0 @ y0) != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f17,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ((more @ x0 @ y0) != $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f12,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ~((more @ x0 @ y0) = $true)), 0.12/0.41 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f11,plain,( 0.12/0.41 ~(more @ x0 @ y0)), 0.12/0.41 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,( 0.12/0.41 ~(more @ x0 @ y0)), 0.12/0.41 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])). 0.12/0.41 thf(f4,conjecture,( 0.12/0.41 (more @ x0 @ y0)), 0.12/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.40bOwsrp7Z/E---3.1_3165088.p',satz81k)). 0.12/0.41 % SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_3165088 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)------------------------------ 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100) 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Termination reason: Refutation 0.12/0.41 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Time elapsed: 0.003 s 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)Instructions burned: 1 (million) 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)------------------------------ 0.12/0.41 % (3165236)------------------------------ 0.12/0.41 % (3165229)Success in time 0.013 s 0.12/0.42 EOF